UNSPSC 85741728: Revision of intraluminal device in fallopian tube, via natural or artificial opening

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of intraluminal device in fallopian tube, via natural or artificial opening. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0UW87DZ

UNSPSC 85741728 Revision of intraluminal device in fallopian tube, via natural or artificial opening is a Commodity code showing no relevant recent activity among state and local governments. The six posted opportunities tagged under this code—including independent medical evaluations for public safety pension disability determinations, surgical procedure carve-outs for municipal health plans, occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers, emergency medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing—fall outside the scope of procedural revision of fallopian tube devices. The mismatch between the code's clinical descriptor and the actual work being solicited suggests either systematic miscoding in these jurisdictions' procurement systems or assignment of a false-positive code label by the data source. State and local governments do procure medical services and staffing broadly, but the narrowly defined device-revision code does not correspond to the demand visible in current opportunities.

The jurisdictions active in these nominally related healthcare categories span multiple states and government types: Arizona (City of Phoenix), California (City of Long Beach, Collier County), Washington State (Department of Transportation), Texas (Harris County), and regional health authorities (Santa Clara County Health System). No pattern of repeat buyers or geographic concentration emerges under the device-revision code itself. Until procurement offices correctly code opportunities involving fallopian tube device procedures, this code remains uninformative for business development targeting state and local demand. Practitioners should monitor whether jurisdictions correct their coding practices or whether the code category itself requires re-evaluation.