UNSPSC 85734222: Bypass right kidney pelvis to ileocutaneous with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right kidney pelvis to ileocutaneous with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T134JC

UNSPSC 85734222 (Bypass right kidney pelvis to ileocutaneous with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach) is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The six recent opportunities posted under this code between July and September 2026 — spanning independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations, surgical carve-out benefit programs, occupational medical surveillance, emergency medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — involve general medical and administrative healthcare services procurement unrelated to the specific surgical procedure named in the code. The code's nominal scope describes a specialized urological surgical technique, whereas the opportunities solicited reflect routine administrative health services, benefits management, and staffing arrangements that fall outside procedural-code taxonomy. State and local governments do not appear to be purchasing the specific service this code describes through traditional procurement channels.

The mismatch between the code's clinical taxonomy and the actual work being solicited suggests either a data classification error on the procurement side or that this particular surgical procedure is not a commodity state and local buyers currently solicit through RFP, RFQ, or IFB channels. Issuers included county and municipal health systems (Santa Clara County, Long Beach, Harris County), state transportation agencies (Washington), city pension boards (Phoenix), and county benefits administration offices, but none were purchasing the specific urological procedure the code nominates. Practitioners evaluating this code should treat it as inactive for state and local procurement purposes.