UNSPSC 85734207: Bypass right kidney pelvis to left ureter, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right kidney pelvis to left ureter, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T134Z7

UNSPSC 85734207, titled "Bypass right kidney pelvis to left ureter, percutaneous endoscopic approach," is a Commodity code that shows a significant mismatch between its medical procedure nomenclature and the actual state and local contract opportunities posted under it. The recent opportunities tagged to this code do not involve urological surgical procedures, organ transplantation, or any percutaneous endoscopic interventions. Instead, they span occupational health surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, surgical procedure carve-outs through Centers of Excellence networks, temporary health professional staffing, youth detention medical services, and independent medical examinations for public safety pension boards. The code does not reflect legitimate procurement activity in its stated surgical domain; the tagging appears to represent a cataloging error rather than genuine demand for the specific procedure the code nominally describes.

State and local buyers posting under this code include county governments (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Santa Clara Health System), city retirement offices (Phoenix Retirement Office), state transportation departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), and public health systems, but the actual work scopes bear no relation to the code's title. Recent opportunities cluster in Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with activity spanning occupational medicine, benefits administration, pension board examinations, and vendor pool qualification for ancillary clinical staffing — none of which aligns with percutaneous urological procedures. Given the fundamental disconnect between the code's procedural scope and the opportunities being posted, this code is not a reliable indicator of purchasing activity in its stated domain and should not be pursued based on current tagging accuracy.