UNSPSC 85733558: Replacement of left ureter with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to replacement of left ureter with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0TR74JZ

UNSPSC 85733558, "Replacement of left ureter with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach," is a Commodity code with minimal actual state and local procurement activity aligned to its nominal medical procedure scope. The source records show no recent solicitations for urological surgical procedures or implantable urinary devices. Instead, the opportunities tagged under this code span occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary clinical staffing, pension medical evaluations, and surgical carve-out networks—none of which involve replacement of the ureter or related urological implants. The code appears to reflect a mismatch between its clinical taxonomy definition and what state and local governments are actually purchasing under this identifier in practice.

The geographic spread across the available records spans Washington, Arizona, California, and Florida, with issuing bodies including the Washington State Department of Transportation (ferries division), the City of Phoenix Retirement Office, the City of Long Beach, Collier County (Florida), Harris County (Texas), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (California). Recent representative opportunities include WSDOT's occupational medical surveillance services (RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026) and the City of Phoenix's independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations (RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026). Given the mismatch between the code's procedural nomenclature and the actual work being solicited, this code merits review for reclassification or audit against intended procurement records; practitioners should not rely on this identifier to track urological implant or surgical procedure opportunities in state and local markets.