UNSPSC 85733546: Resection of bilateral kidneys, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to resection of bilateral kidneys, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0TT24ZZ

UNSPSC 85733546 Resection of bilateral kidneys, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not align with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, yet the six recent opportunities posted under it involve occupational medical examinations, disability benefit medical record review and summarization, Centers of Excellence surgical carve-out programs for government employee health plans, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, and emergency medical services for youth in custody. These solicitations reflect administrative and clinical support services for employee benefits and detention healthcare rather than the specialized urological surgery the code name describes. No recent opportunities actually procure the bilateral kidney resection procedure or related surgical equipment, supplies, or facility services.

The source provides no evidence of demand for the code's stated commodity within state and local procurement during the review period. The geographic distribution of issuers spans Arizona (City of Phoenix Retirement Office), California (City of Long Beach, County of Santa Clara Health System), Washington (Washington State Department of Transportation), Florida (Collier County Board of County Commissioners), and Texas (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), but the mismatch between the code's surgical classification and the nature of posted opportunities suggests these jurisdictions tagged opportunities incorrectly or the code does not capture the work being bought. The systematic nature of this mismatch across multiple issuing bodies and states indicates the code is not a relevant procurement category for state and local business development purposes.