UNSPSC 85733367: Occlusion of left kidney pelvis with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of left kidney pelvis with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0TL43CZ

UNSPSC 85733367 Occlusion of left kidney pelvis with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that carries a medical-procedure classification at odds with the state and local opportunities tagged under it. The recent solicitations show little relevant activity under this code's nominal scope. The opportunities posted include independent medical evaluation services for disability retirement determinations, occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers, surgical benefit carve-out programs, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, specialty medical services for detained youth, and emergency hospital services — none of which involve urological device placement or kidney-pelvis occlusion procedures. The mismatch between the code's clinical specificity and the broader health services being solicited suggests either tagging misalignment or that state and local procurement offices are using this Commodity code to classify administrative and contracting activities that fall outside its intended scope.

The issuing bodies include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office, the City of Long Beach, the Washington State Department of Transportation (on behalf of Washington State Ferries), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, and the County of Santa Clara Health System — a mix of city procurement offices, state transportation departments, county human resources and corrections divisions, and public health systems. Geographic spread covers Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and Florida. Given the consistent mismatch between the Commodity code and the solicitations presented, this code does not represent a reliable procurement signal for business development under its stated classification.