UNSPSC 85733235: Bypass right kidney pelvis to colocutaneous with autologous tissue substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right kidney pelvis to colocutaneous with autologous tissue substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T13079

UNSPSC 85733235 Bypass right kidney pelvis to colocutaneous with autologous tissue substitute, open approach is a Commodity code, but recent state and local procurement activity under this code does not reflect the specific surgical procedure named in the taxonomy. Instead, the code captures a broad range of health services and medical management procurements across multiple issuing bodies—city retirement systems, county health systems, state transportation agencies, county probation departments, and county commissioners—each soliciting distinct categories of medical services that do not align with the narrow procedural scope the code nominally describes.

Recent opportunities posted under this code include independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office, RFP due October 16, 2026); surgical benefit carve-out programs through Centers of Excellence networks (City of Long Beach, RFP due October 7, 2026); occupational medical surveillance for transportation workers (Washington State Department of Transportation, RFP due October 9, 2026); specialty and emergency medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, RFI due September 25, 2026); pharmacy benefit management (Collier County Board of County Commissioners, RFP due April 9, 2026); and temporary health professional staffing across multiple ancillary clinical categories (County of Santa Clara Health System, RFP due October 7, 2026). The geographic spread includes Arizona, California, Washington State, Texas, and Florida. The code shows little coherent recent activity aligned to its nominal procedure name; the mismatch between the taxonomy descriptor and actual procurement activity suggests either misclassification within the issuing body's tagging system or use of this code as a catch-all for health services that do not fit narrower procedural classifications.