UNSPSC 85733229: Bypass right kidney pelvis to left kidney pelvis with synthetic substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right kidney pelvis to left kidney pelvis with synthetic substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T130J4

UNSPSC 85733229 Bypass right kidney pelvis to left kidney pelvis with synthetic substitute, open approach is a Commodity code that does not correspond to the scope of work actually being solicited under it in recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure involving urological anastomosis, yet the recent opportunities tagged with this code cover occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, surgical procedure carve-out benefit programs, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, and temporary ancillary health professional staffing. None of these solicitations concern urological bypass surgery or the implantation of synthetic substitutes. The code shows little relevant recent activity aligned with its stated commodity scope.

The geographic and issuing-body mix across the tagged opportunities spans Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington State, covering municipal retirement boards, county governments, state transportation agencies, county juvenile probation departments, and public health systems. The opportunities themselves—ranging from a $750,000 five-year independent medical evaluation services contract with the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (RFP, due October 16, 2026) to a pharmacy benefit management solicitation with Collier County covering approximately $8.7 million in annual pharmacy spending (RFP, due April 9, 2026)—represent administrative and clinical support services rather than surgical procedures or medical devices. This systematic mismatch between the code's procedural definition and the actual work being purchased suggests either a data-entry error in how these opportunities were classified or a fundamental misalignment in how this particular code is being applied within the state and local procurement taxonomy.