UNSPSC 85733222: Bypass right kidney pelvis to ileocutaneous with synthetic substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right kidney pelvis to ileocutaneous with synthetic substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T130JC

UNSPSC 85733222 Bypass right kidney pelvis to ileocutaneous with synthetic substitute, open approach is a Commodity code that does not reflect the state and local procurement activity tagged under it in recent solicitations. The code nominally describes a surgical urological procedure, yet the recent opportunities show little alignment with that scope. Instead, issuing bodies have tagged the code against independent medical evaluation services, pharmacy benefit management, occupational health surveillance, surgical benefit carve-outs for employee health plans, temporary health professional staffing, and emergency medical services for detained youth — none of which are urological surgical procedures or direct medical supply procurement. The mismatch between the code's nominal scope and actual usage suggests either a classification error in the source records or a downstream system issue rather than active state and local procurement demand for the procedure itself.

The recent opportunities under this code span Arizona, California, Washington, and Texas issuing bodies — the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (independent medical evaluations for disability determinations); the City of Long Beach (surgical benefit carve-out services); the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational medical surveillance); Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (emergency and specialty medical services); Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management); and Santa Clara County Health System (temporary health professional staffing). No pattern of repeat buyers or geographic concentration emerges. Given the clear disconnect between the code's surgical-procedure name and the healthcare administrative and staffing services actually being solicited, this code shows little actionable activity for vendors pursuing state and local opportunities in medical devices, surgical supplies, or procedural services.