UNSPSC 85733221: Bypass right kidney pelvis to cutaneous with synthetic substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right kidney pelvis to cutaneous with synthetic substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T130JD

UNSPSC 85733221 Bypass right kidney pelvis to cutaneous with synthetic substitute, open approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity aligned with its surgical-procedure scope. The six state and local opportunities tagged under this code span medical services procurement, but none involve urological surgical implants or procedures matching the code's description. Instead, the recent solicitations include independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office), surgical benefit carve-outs for Centers of Excellence networks (City of Long Beach), occupational medical surveillance (Washington State Department of Transportation), emergency and inpatient hospital services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County Board of County Commissioners), and temporary health professional staffing (County of Santa Clara Health System).

The issuing bodies are a mix of city retirement offices, municipal human resources, state transportation departments, county juvenile justice systems, county health care consortiums, and county health systems. Geographic spread includes Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and Florida. Because the code's nominal scope—a specific urological surgical procedure with a synthetic implant—does not match the work actually being solicited in recent opportunities, the code appears either misapplied by the issuing jurisdictions or dormant for procurement purposes. Firms pursuing this code should verify with state and local procurement offices whether the tagging reflects a systematic categorization error or whether the code is genuinely inactive for state and local contracting.