UNSPSC 85733213: Bypass right kidney pelvis to bladder with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right kidney pelvis to bladder with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T130KB

UNSPSC 85733213 (Bypass right kidney pelvis to bladder with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach), a Commodity code, does not align with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, but the six recent opportunities sourced show no activity related to this procedure or its supply, materials, or direct medical implementation. Instead, the recent solicitations under this code span occupational medical surveillance (Washington State Ferries), independent medical evaluations for disability determinations (City of Phoenix), surgical benefits carve-out administration (City of Long Beach), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County), temporary health professional staffing pools (County of Santa Clara), and specialty medical services for detained youth (Harris County). These opportunities involve medical service administration, staffing intermediation, and benefits management rather than the urological surgical procedure the code nominally describes, suggesting a data-tagging misalignment rather than a market for this specific surgical service in state and local procurement.

The lack of coherent activity under this Commodity code signals that state and local governments are not actively soliciting the procedure itself or related implant materials and surgical supplies through formal procurement channels. The code does not reflect recent RFP or RFQ activity in any focused geographic region. Any pursuit strategy would need to validate whether the code reflects a real procurement gap or a taxonomy classification error in the sourcing system, as the opportunities present do not support a business case for positioning under this code tier.