UNSPSC 85732918: Bypass left ureter to ileocutaneous with synthetic substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass left ureter to ileocutaneous with synthetic substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T170JC

UNSPSC 85732918 (Bypass left ureter to ileocutaneous with synthetic substitute, open approach) is a Commodity code that appears in state and local procurement records with minimal recent activity aligned to its clinical procedure scope. The recent opportunities tagged under this code do not involve surgical implants, urological reconstruction, or the specific procedure named; instead, they span occupational health screening, disability medical evaluation, pharmacy benefit management, hospital-based emergency and specialty care, and temporary clinical staffing placement. This mismatch between the code's nominal surgical-procedure scope and the actual work being solicited suggests the code does not reflect active state and local buying patterns for the procedure itself.

The issuing bodies across the recent opportunities include a state transportation department (Washington State Department of Transportation), county-level health systems and probation offices (Harris County, Santa Clara County, Collier County), and municipal retirement boards (City of Phoenix). The geographic spread spans Washington, Arizona, California, and Florida. No single body appears as a repeat buyer under this code in the recent record. Given the fundamental disconnect between the code definition and the actual solicitations posted beneath it, this code should be considered inactive for pursuing state and local procurement related to urological surgical reconstruction procedures. Vendors in that specialty should verify the correct UNSPSC classification through direct outreach to procurement offices or by consulting the taxonomy directly, as the current code appears to be a data-entry or classification error rather than a reliable signal of market opportunity.