UNSPSC 85732902: Bypass left ureter to ileocutaneous, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass left ureter to ileocutaneous, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T170ZC

UNSPSC 85732902 Bypass left ureter to ileocutaneous, open approach is a Commodity code that does not correspond to identifiable state and local procurement activity in the source material. The code nomenclature describes a surgical procedure, yet the recent opportunities tagged under it span occupational medical surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, surgical benefit carve-outs, and emergency medical services for detained youth—none of which involve urological bypass procedures or related surgical supplies. The mismatch suggests either a data classification error or an artifact of how the state and local procurement system has tagged health-related solicitations to this code. State and local health agencies, county governments, and regional health systems are soliciting under this code identifier, but the work being bought bears no operational relationship to the code's nominal scope.

The recent opportunities show activity across multiple jurisdictions and issuing bodies: the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational health), the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (disability evaluations), the City of Long Beach (surgical network management), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (specialty and emergency care), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy administration), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (temporary staffing). The geographic footprint spans Washington, Arizona, California, Florida, and Texas, with response dates ranging from September through October 2026. Because the code's taxonomy label does not match what state and local governments are actually procuring under it, this code does not present a reliable basis for vendor pursuit or market assessment at present.