UNSPSC 85732825: Bypass bilateral ureters to cutaneous with autologous tissue substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass bilateral ureters to cutaneous with autologous tissue substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T1807D

UNSPSC 85732825 Bypass bilateral ureters to cutaneous with autologous tissue substitute, open approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity. The code's nominal scope—a specific surgical procedure involving urological reconstruction—does not align with the state and local opportunities recently tagged under it. The solicitations that appear in the recent-opportunities block involve occupational medical surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, specialty surgical carve-outs for employee benefits, and inpatient emergency care for youth in detention. None of these services constitute or support the urological surgical procedure named in the code.

State and local procurement activity recorded under this code does not reflect the UNSPSC category's intended scope. Issuers tagging opportunities with this code include the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers), the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (disability benefit medical evaluations), Collier County (pharmacy benefit management), Santa Clara County Health System (temporary health professional staffing), the City of Long Beach (surgical procedure carve-outs for employee benefits), and Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (emergency and specialty hospital services). Geographic activity spans Washington, Arizona, Florida, and California. The mismatch between the code's narrow surgical definition and the breadth of general health administration and staffing services actually solicited suggests either systematic miscoding or that this Commodity code is not a reliable signal for procurement intent in state and local markets.