UNSPSC 85732625: Removal of infusion device from ureter, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of infusion device from ureter, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0TP903Z

UNSPSC 85732625 Removal of infusion device from ureter, open approach is a Commodity code that does not align with the recent state and local contract opportunities placed under it. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, yet the opportunities sourced under this code reflect healthcare administration, staffing, benefits management, and occupational medicine services — none involving urological device removal.

Recent opportunities include Phoenix Retirement Office procurement of independent medical evaluation services for public safety disability determinations (RFP RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026), the City of Long Beach requesting proposals for surgical procedure carve-out benefit programs for municipal employees (RFP HR26753, due October 7, 2026), the Washington State Department of Transportation soliciting occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers (RFP RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department issuing an RFI for emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth (RFI 071626BNM, due September 25, 2026), Collier County Pharmacy Benefit Management administration covering 2,400 enrolled employees and 4,800 covered members (RFP 25-8414), and the County of Santa Clara Health System establishing a vendor pool for temporary ancillary health professional staffing across audiology, radiology, respiratory care, surgical nursing, and therapy services (RFQ RFSQHHSFY270052, due October 7, 2026). The issuing bodies span state departments, county governments, cities, and independent health systems across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. The mismatch between the code's procedural scope and the actual work being solicited suggests either persistent tagging error in the source data or that this code is not in active use for state and local procurement in the categories tracked.