UNSPSC 85732319: Drainage of left ureter via natural or artificial opening drainage device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of left ureter via natural or artificial opening drainage device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T9780Z

UNSPSC 85732319 Drainage of left ureter via natural or artificial opening drainage device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic is a Commodity code that shows no alignment between its nominal scope—a highly specific urological procedure—and the recent state and local contract opportunities posted under this code. The source records six recent solicitations tagged to this code: independent medical evaluation services for public-safety pension disability determinations (City of Phoenix), surgical benefit carve-out for employee health plans (City of Long Beach), occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers (Washington State Department of Transportation), specialty and emergency medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County, Florida), and temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories (County of Santa Clara Health System). None of these opportunities involve urological drainage procedures or endoscopic interventions. The code appears to be a data-classification mismatch; state and local procurement offices have tagged general medical services and health-plan administration to a code describing a discrete surgical procedure.

The recent opportunities do reveal a mixed issuing-body profile spanning county health systems (Santa Clara), county human resources and benefits divisions (Collier, Long Beach), state transportation departments (Washington), county juvenile justice (Harris), and municipal pension offices (Phoenix). Geographic coverage includes Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no single jurisdiction repeating in this small sample. Because the code shows no meaningful alignment with actual procurement activity, business development professionals should not rely on this code to signal relevant opportunity flow for urological device or service offerings. If your firm pursues medical staffing, health benefits administration, or occupational health surveillance in the state and local market, monitor those categories separately; this code does not reliably tag that work.