UNSPSC 85732043: Restriction of left kidney pelvis, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of left kidney pelvis, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0TV48ZZ

UNSPSC 85732043 Restriction of left kidney pelvis, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic is a Commodity code describing a specific urological surgical procedure; however, recent state and local procurement activity under this code does not reflect surgical procedure procurement. Instead, the opportunities posted against this code span occupational health examinations, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary clinical staffing placement, pediatric detention-facility medical services, and surgical center-of-excellence network administration — none of which align with the code's nominal scope of urological intervention. The code shows minimal relevant recent activity for firms pursuing state and local contracts in the actual procedure or equipment domain the code nominally describes.

The six opportunities posted under this code between July and September 2026 originate from diverse issuing bodies: the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational surveillance), the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (disability medical record review and independent medical examinations), the City of Long Beach (surgical benefit carve-out program administration), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (pediatric emergency and specialty medical services), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management), and Santa Clara County Health System (temporary health professional staffing pool). Geographic spread spans Washington, Arizona, California, Texas, and Florida. The mismatch between code label and actual procurement scope suggests a taxonomy coding error rather than genuine demand under the code's stated category; firms should verify UNSPSC coding accuracy in real-time RFP review before resource commitment.