UNSPSC 85731951: Bypass bladder to cutaneous, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass bladder to cutaneous, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0T1B4ZD

UNSPSC 85731951 Bypass bladder to cutaneous, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The code's technical medical-device taxonomy does not match the actual solicitations posted under it, which instead focus on institutional healthcare service delivery, pharmacy benefit management, and medical administrative functions rather than specific surgical implants or devices.

The recent opportunities associated with this code span health systems and county government procurement across Florida and Georgia, including the Columbus Consolidated Government's Finance Department Purchasing Division (Muscogee County Prison inmate medical and pharmacy services, RFP No. 26-0008, due May 15, 2026), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management services covering approximately 7,200 members, RFP 25-8414, due April 9, 2026), and Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (virtual primary and urgent care services for approximately 2,300 county members, RFP, due April 16, 2026). Additional postings include San Mateo County Health Behavioral Health and Recovery Services (mental health peer support pilot, RFP No. 2025-007, $580,000 total funding) and Santa Monica Fire Department (medical director services for EMS oversight, RFP, due October 16, 2025). The code shows little relevant recent activity for the specific device or service indicated in its title; vendors should verify actual procurement intent before pursuing opportunities coded under this classification, as the mismatch between taxonomy and solicitation content suggests potential miscoding by issuing bodies.