UNSPSC 85731703: Insertion of artificial sphincter into urethra, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of artificial sphincter into urethra, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0THD3LZ

UNSPSC 85731703, Insertion of artificial sphincter into urethra, percutaneous approach, is a Commodity code that shows minimal relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The five most recently posted state and local opportunities tagged with this code cover inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary and urgent care services, peer support services for mental health workers, and fire department medical director services—none of which involve urological surgical devices or procedures. The code's nominal scope addresses a specific surgical implant procedure, but the tagged solicitations reflect broad-based health services procurement across clinical, administrative, and support functions unrelated to urethral sphincter insertion.

State and local issuing bodies posting opportunities under this code span county health systems and government health benefits administration (Muscogee County Prison in Georgia; Collier County, Florida; Monroe County, Florida; San Mateo County, California; and Santa Monica Fire Department, California), reflecting a fragmented jurisdictional mix focused on employee health benefits, correctional healthcare, and municipal emergency services rather than specialized surgical procurement. Geographic activity centers on Florida and California, with single instances in Georgia and limited signal of concentrated or recurring procurement demand for urological surgical implants. No recent solicitations name surgical device vendors, procurement budgets for medical devices, or response dates aligned with active device purchasing cycles. The mismatch between the code's surgical-implant scope and the health-services-administration focus of tagged opportunities suggests either miscoding in the source data or a fundamental absence of state and local demand for this specific urological procedure and device category at present.