UNSPSC 85731416: Revision of autologous tissue substitute in bladder, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of autologous tissue substitute in bladder, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0TWB07Z

UNSPSC 85731416 Revision of autologous tissue substitute in bladder, open approach is a Commodity code that shows no recent activity aligned with its nominal scope. The six most recent state and local contract opportunities tagged to this code involve independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations, surgical procedure carve-out benefits management, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which describe revision of autologous bladder tissue substitutes or related urological procedures. The code appears to be applied to general healthcare procurement opportunities rather than the specific surgical intervention its name denotes.

The issuing bodies span multiple jurisdictions and agency types, including city retirement offices (City of Phoenix), municipal human resources departments (City of Long Beach), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile justice systems (Harris County), county government procurement divisions (Collier County Board of County Commissioners), and regional health systems (County of Santa Clara Health System). Geographic activity includes Arizona, California, Florida, Washington, and Texas. Because the opportunities represent healthcare administration and staffing rather than the surgical procedure the code nominally describes, this code does not serve as a reliable procurement indicator for urological device or implant vendors. A mismatch of this magnitude suggests either systematic miscoding at the state and local level or that the code is no longer actively used for its intended commodity classification.