UNSPSC 85731352: Excision of urethra, external approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to excision of urethra, external approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0TBDXZZ

UNSPSC 85731352 Excision of urethra, external approach is a Commodity code whose nominal scope—a surgical procedure—does not align with the recent state and local contract opportunities tagged under it. The posted opportunities reflect procurement of occupational medical surveillance services, independent medical evaluations for disability determinations, specialty and emergency medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management administration, health professional staffing, and surgical benefit carve-out program management. None of these solicitations involve urethral excision or related surgical procedures. The code shows little relevant recent activity for the procedure it nominally describes.

State and local issuers posting opportunities under this code include county government procurement offices (Collier County, Harris County, Santa Clara County), city retirement boards (City of Phoenix), state transportation departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), and municipal health systems (City of Long Beach). Recent solicitations span Arizona, California, Florida, Washington, and Texas, with response dates in September and October 2026. Representative opportunities include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's RFP for independent medical evaluation services due October 16, 2026; the Washington State Department of Transportation's RFP for occupational medical surveillance services due October 9, 2026 with a pre-bid conference on August 31, 2026; and the County of Santa Clara Health System's multiple-award qualification vehicle for temporary health professional staffing due October 7, 2026. The misalignment between code nomenclature and actual procurement activity suggests either a systematic tagging error across multiple jurisdictions or a code classification that does not reflect current state and local buying patterns.