UNSPSC 85725603: Revision of spacer in left sacroiliac joint, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of spacer in left sacroiliac joint, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0SW848Z

UNSPSC 85725603 Revision of spacer in left sacroiliac joint, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code with little recent state and local procurement activity aligned to its technical clinical scope. The recent opportunities tagged under this code reflect substantial mismatch: the sources show state and local issuing bodies procuring occupational medical surveillance services, independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, surgical Center of Excellence carve-out programs for employee health plans, and emergency medical services for detained youth—none of which involves sacroiliac joint revision procedures or endoscopic orthopedic intervention at the point of care or purchase. State and local governments do not typically procure specific surgical procedures or implant-level medical services through competitive procurement; those transactions occur within health plan networks, hospital supply chains, or employee benefits administration.

The issuing bodies in the recent-opportunities block—the City of Phoenix Retirement Office, City of Long Beach, Washington State Department of Transportation (ferries operations), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County, and Santa Clara Health System—are purchasing administrative medical services, benefit management, staffing, and network access rather than the procedure or device itself. Geographic spread includes Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and multi-state. The mismatch between code name and actual procurement activity suggests either a data-entry error in the tagging of these solicitations or a fundamental misalignment between the code's clinical nomenclature and how state and local procurement systems classify health benefits and occupational health services. For business development purposes, this code shows no actionable recent opportunity signal in the state and local market.