UNSPSC 85725163: Supplement coccygeal joint with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement coccygeal joint with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0SU637Z

UNSPSC 85725163 Supplement coccygeal joint with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that nominally describes a specific orthopedic surgical procedure, yet the recent state and local contract opportunities tagged under it show no alignment with that scope. Instead, the opportunities capture medical services, health plan administration, pharmacy benefit management, occupational surveillance, and temporary staffing across clinical settings—none of which involve coccygeal joint supplementation or tissue implantation. The code as tagged does not reflect the work actually being solicited by state and local bodies.

The recent opportunities span diverse issuing bodies: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office seeking independent medical evaluation services for disability benefit determinations; the City of Long Beach pursuing surgical procedure carve-out management for its employee health plan; the Washington State Department of Transportation requesting occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers; Harris County Juvenile Probation Department issuing an RFI for emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth; Collier County seeking pharmacy benefit management; and the County of Santa Clara Health System establishing a vendor pool for temporary health professional staffing. Geographic distribution includes Arizona, California, Florida, Washington, and Texas. No single issuing body appears more than once in the recent opportunities block. The mismatch between the code's stated scope and the actual procurement activity it captures suggests either an anomaly in how the opportunities were classified or that this code does not represent active state and local procurement aligned with its formal definition.