UNSPSC 85723725: Revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in right knee joint, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in right knee joint, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0SWC3KZ

UNSPSC 85723725 Revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in right knee joint, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows no substantive alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific orthopedic surgical procedure — revision of an artificial knee implant via percutaneous (needle-based) approach — yet the six recent opportunities posted to state and local procurement systems involve occupational health surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary clinical staffing, surgical center-of-excellence networks, and emergency medical services for detained youth. None of these solicitations procure orthopedic surgical procedures, implants, or tissue substitutes. The mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding by one or more issuing bodies or that this particular code is not actively used by state and local governments to tag medical procurement of any kind.

The recent opportunities span Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington and involve diverse issuing bodies — city retirement offices, county human resources divisions, county health systems, state transportation departments, and county juvenile probation — but none track to joint-revision surgery or implant procurement. No orthopedic surgery, implant supply, or tissue-substitute opportunities appear in the available record. A business development professional evaluating this code should treat it as inactive for state and local procurement purposes based on current visibility, though the absence of matching opportunities may reflect data-tagging inconsistency rather than zero demand.