UNSPSC 85721800: Joints foot, percutaneous approach-part A

This class includes one or more of 16 standard surgical interventions or procedures on component parts of the joints of the foot with percutaneous approach. These surgical interventions or procedures are listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 PCS under code 0S.

UNSPSC 85721800 Joints foot, percutaneous approach-part A is a Class code that shows minimal alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The five most recent opportunities tagged to this code span inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary and urgent care, peer support for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical director services — none of which involve musculoskeletal joint procedures or percutaneous orthopedic interventions. The mismatch between the code's clinical scope and the opportunities actually solicited suggests either systematic miscoding in the issuing jurisdictions' procurement systems or that the code is being applied to broader healthcare service contracts rather than to specific procedural or device categories.

The issuing bodies include county governments (Muscogee County, Georgia; Collier County, Florida; Monroe County, Florida), a county health department (San Mateo County, California), and a municipal fire department (Santa Monica, California). Recent opportunities posted between February and April 2026 include a Columbus Consolidated Government RFP for inmate medical and pharmacy services due May 15, 2026; a Collier County RFP for pharmacy benefit management services with a deadline of April 9, 2026; a Monroe County RFP for virtual primary and urgent care services due April 16, 2026; a San Mateo County BHRS RFP for peer support pilot services; and a Santa Monica Fire Department RFP for medical director services. Activity appears concentrated in Florida and California with isolated representation from Georgia, but the code's poor fit to the actual scope of work limits confidence in drawing geographic or sectoral conclusions from these records.