UNSPSC 85715568: Supplement cervicothoracic vertebral joint with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement cervicothoracic vertebral joint with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0RU40KZ

UNSPSC 85715568 Supplement cervicothoracic vertebral joint with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach is a Commodity code with minimal recent state and local procurement activity aligned to its nominal surgical scope. The recent solicitations tagged under this code address occupational medical surveillance, independent disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, Centers of Excellence surgical carve-out programs, and emergency services for youth in custody — none of which involve spinal fusion or vertebral joint procedures. The code shows little decision-relevant activity for vendors specializing in orthopedic implants, surgical devices, or spinal fusion services at the state and local level.

The Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational medical surveillance), the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (disability medical evaluations), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefits), the County of Santa Clara Health System (temporary staffing), the City of Long Beach (surgical carve-out networks), and Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (emergency medical services) represent the issuing bodies in recent postings. Geographic activity spans Washington, Arizona, Florida, California, and Texas. No evidence supports that state and local procurement under this code is concentrated in any region or that a particular jurisdiction is a repeat buyer. The mismatch between the code's name and the actual scope of recent opportunities suggests either classification error in the source data or incidental tagging; prospective vendors should verify whether the code accurately reflects their target buyer population before committing pursuit resources.