UNSPSC 85714815: Insertion of interspinous process spinal stabilization device into occipital-cervical joint, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of interspinous process spinal stabilization device into occipital-cervical joint, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0RH00BZ

UNSPSC 85714815 Insertion of interspinous process spinal stabilization device into occipital-cervical joint, open approach is a Commodity code that shows limited relevance to recent state and local procurement activity. The code describes a specific surgical procedure involving spinal implant placement; however, the recent opportunities tagged under this code do not reflect surgical device procurement or orthopedic implant supply.

The recent solicitations posted under this code span healthcare service delivery rather than medical device supply or surgical implants. Columbus Consolidated Government's Finance Department issued RFP No. 26-0008 in April 2026 for comprehensive inmate medical and pharmacy services at Muscogee County Prison, including sick call, chronic care management, emergency services, laboratory and x-ray, and pharmacy—none involving spinal hardware. Collier County issued RFP 25-8414 in April 2026 for pharmacy benefit management services covering 2,400 employees and 4,800 covered members with approximately $8.7 million in annual historical pharmacy spending. Monroe County issued an RFP in March 2026 for virtual primary and urgent care services for 2,300 county members. San Mateo County issued RFP No. 2025-007 for peer support services for peer workers under a Mental Health Services Act Innovation pilot project with $580,000 total funding. Santa Monica Fire Department issued an RFP for a medical director physician through a professional services agreement. The mismatch between the code's surgical-device scope and the health-service work actually being solicited suggests the tagging is erroneous and the code carries minimal decision relevance for firms pursuing state and local procurement in medical devices or surgical supplies.