UNSPSC 85714314: Removal of internal fixation device from right finger phalangeal joint, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of internal fixation device from right finger phalangeal joint, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0RPW44Z

UNSPSC 85714314 Removal of internal fixation device from right finger phalangeal joint, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal recent activity in state and local procurement aligned with its clinical procedure taxonomy. The recent opportunities posted under this code do not reflect the specific surgical intervention the code nominally describes; instead, they span occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, disability medical record review, surgical procedure networks, and detention-facility emergency care — a collection of administrative and operational health services unrelated to orthopedic fixation removal. The mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding in the source opportunities or a gap between the code's technical definition and actual state and local procurement labeling practice. No state or local jurisdictions have posted solicitations specifically requesting removal of internal fixation devices or related orthopedic surgical services under this code in the recent-opportunities record.

The issuing bodies in the source span county health systems (Santa Clara County Health System), county procurement offices (Collier County, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), city retirement and benefits offices (City of Phoenix Retirement Office, City of Long Beach), and state transportation authorities (Washington State Department of Transportation). Geographic activity appears concentrated in California, Arizona, Washington, Florida, and Texas, but these opportunities do not substantiate purchasing under the code itself. Without concrete evidence of state and local demand for the service described in the code's taxonomy, practitioners evaluating this code should verify whether it reflects current procurement practice or represents a taxonomy designation disconnected from actual buyer activity in their target jurisdictions.