UNSPSC 85713863: Removal of infusion device from right carpal joint, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of infusion device from right carpal joint, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0RPQ33Z

UNSPSC 85713863 Removal of infusion device from right carpal joint, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent activity among state and local government solicitations. The code describes a specific surgical procedure — removal of an infusion device from the wrist joint using a needle-based approach — but the state and local procurement records in the source reflect health plan administration, occupational medical surveillance, temporary clinical staffing, pharmacy benefit management, and disability evaluation services, none of which involve orthopedic device removal or surgical interventions at the point-of-care level. The issuing bodies pursuing these opportunities include a city retirement board (Phoenix), municipalities (Long Beach), a state transportation department (Washington), a county juvenile probation department (Harris County), a county health system (Santa Clara), and a county board of commissioners (Collier County). The geographic spread includes Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and Florida.

The mismatch between the code's clinical scope and the actual procurement activity suggests either a data-classification error in the source or that orthopedic device removal is not a discrete procurement line item for state and local government health systems. State and local buyers typically procure surgical services through hospital credentialing networks, bundled payment agreements with Centers of Excellence, or occupational health contracts — categories that appear in the recent record under different codes. Businesses pursuing this code should verify whether state and local demand for discrete orthopedic procedure coding exists in practice, as the recent opportunity block provides no evidence of it.