UNSPSC 85713622: Revision of internal fixation device in left metacarpophalangeal joint, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of internal fixation device in left metacarpophalangeal joint, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0RWV34Z

UNSPSC 85713622, Revision of internal fixation device in left metacarpophalangeal joint, percutaneous approach, is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement. The code's nominal scope—a specific orthopedic surgical procedure—does not align with the recent solicitations tagged under it. The six recent opportunities in the source span independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty medical services for youth in custody, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing. None of these solicitations address implantable devices or hand surgery procedures. The mismatch suggests either categorical tagging error or that the code is used so infrequently in state and local procurement that recent activity under it is sparse or misclassified.

The geographic spread of the opportunities tagged to this code spans Arizona (Phoenix), California (Long Beach and Santa Clara County), Washington State, Texas (Harris County), and Florida (Collier County), but this breadth reflects the diversity of the unrelated medical services being solicited rather than concentrated activity under the device code itself. No recent solicitations explicitly procure orthopedic internal fixation devices or hand surgery implants. Business development professionals evaluating this code should verify whether it applies to supplies or services their firm actually provides and consider whether mislabeling in the procurement source material warrants clarification with issuing bodies before pursuing opportunities.