UNSPSC 85713149: Revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in left carpal joint, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in left carpal joint, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0RWR0KZ

UNSPSC 85713149 Revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in left carpal joint, open approach (Commodity) shows limited alignment between its nominal medical-procedure coding and the work actually being solicited under it in state and local procurement. The recent opportunities tagged to this code are primarily administrative and occupational health services — medical record review and summarization for pension disability determinations, surgical-procedure carve-out benefit administration, occupational medical surveillance, and specialty staffing — rather than orthopedic tissue-replacement procedures. State and local buyers using this code include city retirement offices, municipal health plans, state transportation agencies, county health systems, and county procurement offices. The geographic spread spans Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no standout pattern of repeat buyers or concentrated activity.

Representative recent opportunities include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's RFP (RTMRFP26001) for independent medical evaluation services supporting disability pension determinations across approximately 75 annual applications, due October 16, 2026, at $750,000 over five years; the City of Long Beach's RFP for surgical-benefit carve-out services for its Anthem PPO plan, due October 7, 2026; and the Washington State Department of Transportation's RFP (RFP20260825) for occupational medical surveillance services for ferry workers across 14 Washington locations, due October 9, 2026 with a pre-bid conference on August 31, 2026. The code's recent activity does not reflect coherent procurement in a single commodity class and suggests either tagging inconsistency or a state-local taxonomy mapping issue rather than genuine market opportunity in tissue-substitute revision procedures.