UNSPSC 85712502: Fusion of left wrist joint with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to fusion of left wrist joint with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0RGP3KZ

UNSPSC 85712502 Fusion of left wrist joint with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent activity under state and local government procurement. The six recent opportunities posted to this code — independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs for municipal employee health plans, occupational medical surveillance for state ferry workers, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary ancillary clinical staffing — represent healthcare administration, employee benefits procurement, and occupational health contracting rather than orthopedic surgical procedures or implant procurement. The code's nominal scope describes a specific surgical procedure and implant type; state and local government purchasing does not typically issue direct procurement notices for individual surgical procedures, which are instead bundled within hospital service contracts, health plan administration, or medical network arrangements negotiated at the system level.

The mismatch reflects how state and local procurement taxonomy sometimes tags opportunities with clinical procedure codes when the underlying buy is administrative — benefits design, medical staffing, claims processing, or provider network management. No evidence in the source supports actual procurement of wrist fusion implants, surgical kits, or procedure-specific supplies under this code by state or local buyers. The code appears to be a data-classification artifact rather than an active procurement category at the state and local level. Firms seeking orthopedic implant or surgical supply sales should monitor higher-tier family or class codes covering medical device distribution and hospital supply contracts, not this commodity-level code.