UNSPSC 85711936: Inspection of right wrist joint, external approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to inspection of right wrist joint, external approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0RJNXZZ

UNSPSC 85711936 Inspection of right wrist joint, external approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with actual state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal scope—a highly specific orthopedic imaging or examination procedure—does not match the recent opportunities tagged under it, which range across disability retirement medical evaluations, occupational health surveillance, surgical benefits management, pharmacy benefit administration, and temporary clinical staffing. State and local buyers are not soliciting wrist-joint inspections as a discrete service line; the code appears to have been applied inconsistently or as a default classification in sourcing systems.

The geographic spread of recent activity includes Arizona (City of Phoenix), California (City of Long Beach and County of Santa Clara), Washington State (WSDOT), Florida (Collier County), and Texas (Harris County), reflecting activity from retirement boards, municipal health benefits offices, state transportation authorities, county human resources divisions, and county health systems. Representative recent solicitations include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's RFP for independent medical evaluation services (RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026, maximum contract value $750,000 over five years), the City of Long Beach's RFP for surgical benefit carve-out programs (HR26753, due October 7, 2026), and the Washington State Department of Transportation's RFP for occupational medical surveillance services (RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026). Because none of these opportunities involve wrist-joint inspections or match the code's technical scope, the code does not support a pursue recommendation; the tagging appears to reflect administrative miscoding rather than an active commodity family under state and local procurement.