UNSPSC 85705106: Removal of synthetic substitute from left toe phalanx, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of synthetic substitute from left toe phalanx, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0QPR0JZ

UNSPSC 85705106 Removal of synthetic substitute from left toe phalanx, open approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity for state and local procurement. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure (removal of a synthetic substitute from a single anatomical site via open surgical approach), yet the recent opportunities tagged under this code do not procure that procedure or related orthopedic surgical services. Instead, the opportunities span occupational medical surveillance, disability benefit medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, health professional staffing, surgical carve-out networks, and emergency services for detained youth—none of which align with the code's stated scope of a defined toe-phalanx procedure.

The issuing bodies in the tagged opportunities include county governments (Collier County, Santa Clara County, Harris County), state departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), and municipal agencies (City of Phoenix, City of Long Beach), reflecting a mix of jurisdictions across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. Representative recent solicitations include the Washington State Department of Transportation's occupational medical surveillance RFP due October 9, 2026, the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's independent medical evaluation services RFP due October 16, 2026, and Santa Clara County Health System's temporary health professional staffing RFP due October 7, 2026. The geographic spread spans the West Coast (Washington, California), Southwest (Arizona), and South (Texas, Florida), though the code itself does not meaningfully map to any of these procurements. The apparent tagging mismatch suggests the code may not be the appropriate classification for active state and local buying under this medical procedure scope, or the category sees negligible procurement activity at the state and local level.