UNSPSC 85703625: Reposition right tibia with monoplanar external fixation device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to reposition right tibia with monoplanar external fixation device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0QSG3BZ

UNSPSC 85703625 (Reposition right tibia with monoplanar external fixation device, percutaneous approach) is a Commodity code that appears to classify a specific orthopedic surgical procedure; however, the recent state and local opportunities posted under this code show little alignment with its nominal scope. The recent solicitations cover inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management (PBM) administration for county employees, virtual primary and urgent care services, peer support services for mental health workers, and fire department medical director services—none of which involve orthopedic surgery or external fixation devices. This mismatch suggests either a tagging error in the procurement system or that the code has been repurposed to capture broader healthcare service procurement outside its original surgical-procedure definition.

The recent opportunities span multiple states and issuing bodies, including county corrections departments (Muscogee County, Georgia), county human resources and health benefits programs (Collier County, Florida and Monroe County, Florida), county behavioral health agencies (San Mateo County, California), and municipal fire departments (Santa Monica, California). Response deadlines have ranged from April 9, 2026 (Collier County PBM services RFP) through July 2, 2025 (San Mateo County peer support RFP). Geographic activity centers on Florida, Georgia, and California. Given the disconnect between the code's procedural name and the healthcare-administration and services work actually being tagged under it, firms should verify code assignment with issuing procurement offices before pursuing opportunities classified here and consider whether the code represents an active or obsolete category in their target jurisdiction's procurement taxonomy.