UNSPSC 85701901: Revision of bone growth stimulator in lower bone, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of bone growth stimulator in lower bone, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0QWY3MZ

UNSPSC 85701901 Revision of bone growth stimulator in lower bone, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code for which the recent state and local contract opportunities show minimal alignment with the code's nominal scope. The six most recent opportunities posted between July and September 2026 address occupational medical surveillance services, independent medical evaluations for disability retirement determinations, surgical care management through Centers of Excellence, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, specialty medical services for youth in detention, and health plan administration — none of which involve bone growth stimulators or orthopedic implant revision procedures. The issuing bodies include state departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), counties (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Santa Clara County), and cities (Phoenix Retirement Office, City of Long Beach), spanning Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington.

The code shows no relevant recent procurement activity. The opportunities tagged to this UNSPSC do not reflect purchases of orthopedic devices, surgical implants, or bone growth stimulation equipment. Given the absence of substantive alignment between the code's device-focused scope and the health services and staffing contracts appearing in the search results, this code does not represent active procurement demand among state and local buyers at this time. Business development professionals evaluating this code should verify whether the tagging reflects miscoding by issuing procurement offices or a genuine absence of market demand for this specific medical device category in state and local contracting.