UNSPSC 85701625: Release left pelvic bone, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to release left pelvic bone, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0QN34ZZ

UNSPSC 85701625 Release left pelvic bone, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code with little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement. The code's nominal scope—a specific orthopedic surgical procedure—does not align with the state and local opportunities posted under it. The recent solicitations tagged to this code are healthcare services contracts addressing inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management, virtual primary and urgent care delivery, peer support for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical direction—none of which involve orthopedic surgery or the clinical procedure the code describes.

State and local issuing bodies pursuing healthcare services contracts are diverse, spanning county jail systems (Muscogee County, Georgia), county benefits administration (Collier County, Florida), county employee health plans (Monroe County, Florida), county behavioral health agencies (San Mateo County, California), and municipal fire departments (Santa Monica, California). The geographic spread includes Georgia, Florida, and California. Representative recent opportunities include the Columbus Consolidated Government's RFP No. 26-0008 for comprehensive inmate medical and pharmacy services at Muscogee County Prison (due May 15, 2026), Collier County Board of County Commissioners' RFP 25-8414 for Pharmacy Benefit Management Services covering 2,400 employees and 4,800 members (closed April 9, 2026), and Monroe County, Florida's RFP for Virtual Primary and Urgent Care Services for approximately 2,300 county members (due April 16, 2026). The code's tagging appears to be a data classification mismatch; vendors evaluating this code should verify with the issuing body whether the code correctly reflects the actual clinical work sought.