UNSPSC 85694357: Insertion of intramedullary internal fixation device into left humeral head, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of intramedullary internal fixation device into left humeral head, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0PHD46Z

UNSPSC 85694357 Insertion of intramedullary internal fixation device into left humeral head, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that appears in state and local procurement records with no direct connection to the specific surgical procedure its name describes. The recent opportunities tagged under this code cover occupational health surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, surgical benefit carve-outs, and emergency medical services for detained youth — none of which involve orthopedic surgical devices or implants. The code shows a data-taxonomy mismatch rather than a coherent procurement market; state and local buyers do not appear to be soliciting intramedullary fixation devices or related orthopedic hardware under this classification.

The issuing bodies in the recent-opportunities block span county human resources departments (Collier County, Santa Clara County Health System), city retirement offices (City of Phoenix), state transportation departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), and county juvenile justice systems (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), working across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. No representative opportunities exist that reflect the code's nominal scope. Without aligned procurement activity, this code merits a skip in the near term unless your firm's competitive position depends on understanding why a specific solicitation was mislabeled — in which case the misclassification itself signals a data-quality issue at the issuing body rather than a market opportunity.