UNSPSC 85693713: Removal of autologous tissue substitute from left ulna, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of autologous tissue substitute from left ulna, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0PPL37Z

UNSPSC 85693713 "Removal of autologous tissue substitute from left ulna, percutaneous approach" is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity under state and local procurement. The code describes a specific surgical procedure on a specific anatomical structure—a clinical intervention taxonomy entry that does not align with the scope of work actually being solicited by state and local jurisdictions today. The recent opportunities tagged to this code span occupational medical surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, specialty surgical carve-out networks, and emergency medical services for detained youth—none of which involve removal of autologous tissue from the ulna or share the procedural specificity the code nominates. The mismatch suggests either systematic tagging misalignment in the source system or that this code is not a reliable signal for state and local procurement activity.

The geographic spread and issuing-body composition of these tagged opportunities remain diverse: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona), the City of Long Beach (California), the Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), and Collier County (Florida), along with the County of Santa Clara Health System (California). However, because the opportunities themselves do not reflect the code's nominal scope, their presence does not indicate active market demand under UNSPSC 85693713 for surgical tissue removal procedures. Bidders should verify code assignments with issuing bodies before committing resources to pursuits tagged to this code, particularly when the RFP scope statement does not reference the procedure the code describes.