UNSPSC 85692407: Removal of synthetic substitute from left scapula, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of synthetic substitute from left scapula, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0PP64JZ

UNSPSC 85692407 Removal of synthetic substitute from left scapula, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal scope—a specific orthopedic surgical procedure code drawn from clinical taxonomy—does not match the work state and local governments are actually buying under this classification. Recent opportunities posted against this code include independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs for municipal employees, occupational health surveillance for ferry workers, specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management administration, and temporary health professional staffing. None of these solicitations involve the orthopedic procedure named in the code; they reflect broad health services administration, staffing, and benefit management work that appears to have been miscoded against an anatomically specific procedure code.

The issuing bodies span municipal retirement offices, city human resources departments, state transportation agencies, county juvenile probation departments, county health systems, and county commissioners' offices across Arizona, California, Washington, and Florida. Without genuine recent opportunities aligned to the code's stated scope, the code presents no meaningful market signals for business development. Vendors should verify code assignment with issuing procurement offices before responding to opportunities tagged under this classification, as the mismatch between the code definition and posted work suggests systematic miscoding rather than legitimate demand for the specific procedure named.