UNSPSC 85691510: Supplement left glenoid cavity with synthetic substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement left glenoid cavity with synthetic substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0PU80JZ

UNSPSC 85691510 Supplement left glenoid cavity with synthetic substitute, open approach is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The five most recent opportunities posted under this code span inmate medical and pharmacy services (Columbus, Georgia), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County, Florida), virtual primary and urgent care services (Monroe County, Florida), peer support services for mental health workers (San Mateo County, California), and fire department medical direction (Santa Monica, California) — none of which involve orthopedic joint procedures, surgical implants, or glenoid cavity supplementation. The mismatch between the code's clinical nomenclature and the actual solicitations suggests either systematic miscoding by issuing bodies or that this code does not map meaningfully to state and local procurement workflows.

State and local procurement offices do not appear to use this UNSPSC classification for orthopedic surgical supply contracts, medical device procurement, or hospital capital equipment. The code's specificity to a single surgical approach and anatomical site is inconsistent with how state and local governments typically tag healthcare procurement — which defaults to broader family or class codes for medical supplies, pharmacy services, or clinical staffing rather than procedure-specific device codes. If orthopedic implant procurement exists in the state and local space, it is likely tagged under different UNSPSC families or negotiated through group purchasing organizations and cooperative purchasing agreements rather than through competitive solicitation at the commodity level. Firms pursuing this code should verify whether state and local RFPs in their target jurisdiction actually reference it; the recent activity available does not support direct pursuit under this classification.