UNSPSC 85682469: Reposition left occipital bone, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to reposition left occipital bone, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0NS80ZZ

UNSPSC 85682469 Reposition left occipital bone, open approach is a Commodity code describing a surgical procedure that does not align with state and local government procurement activity. The recent opportunities tagged under this code reflect healthcare administration and workforce support services—pharmacy benefit management, inmate medical services, virtual primary care, peer worker support, and fire department medical direction—none of which involve the orthopedic surgical intervention the code nominally describes. State and local buyers are using this code to classify broader healthcare contracting activity rather than discrete surgical procedures, creating a fundamental mismatch between the code's clinical scope and actual procurement use.

No recent opportunities in the source materially reflect the code's stated clinical content. The issuing bodies—Columbus Consolidated Government (Muscogee County Prison medical services), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management), Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (virtual primary care), San Mateo County Health (peer support services), and Santa Monica Fire Department (medical director services)—are soliciting management, administration, and staffing contracts in healthcare delivery rather than surgical procedures. Activity spans Florida, Georgia, California, and multiple jurisdiction types (county governments, health authorities, fire departments), but the geographic and issuing-body variation is irrelevant when the underlying work being bought bears no relation to the code's nominal scope. Firms evaluating whether to pursue opportunities under this code should recognize that the tagging reflects administrative error or system drift rather than intentional procurement classification; the code warrants review for recalibration or removal from active state and local buying taxonomies.