UNSPSC 85682062: Removal of drainage device from facial bone, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of drainage device from facial bone, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0NPW40Z

UNSPSC 85682062, Removal of drainage device from facial bone, percutaneous endoscopic approach, is a Commodity code that does not reflect the medical services state and local governments are actually procuring under this taxonomy tag. Recent solicitations show no state or local opportunities for surgical removal of facial drainage devices; instead, the code has been applied to six unrelated healthcare administration and staffing procurements spanning occupational medicine surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, surgical benefit carve-outs, youth detention medical services, and temporary clinical staffing. This classification mismatch indicates the code has been misapplied to administrative and contracting functions rather than the surgical procedure it nominally describes.

The issuing bodies include county boards of commissioners (Collier County, Harris County), city retirement and health offices (Phoenix, Long Beach), state transportation departments (Washington), and county health systems (Santa Clara). Recent opportunities range from Phoenix's RFP for independent medical evaluation services (due October 16, 2026) budgeted at $750,000 over five years to Collier County's RFP for pharmacy benefit management covering approximately $8.7 million in annual pharmacy spending, with the Long Beach surgical benefit carve-out proposal due October 7, 2026 and the Washington State Ferries occupational medical surveillance RFP due October 9, 2026. Activity is concentrated in Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no clear geographic clustering. The code's poor alignment with recent solicitations suggests either a data-entry error in the taxonomy assignment or a systemic miscoding issue; prospective vendors should verify the correct UNSPSC code for any target work rather than relying on this classification.