UNSPSC 85681755: Excision of right maxilla, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to excision of right maxilla, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0NBR3ZZ

UNSPSC 85681755 Excision of right maxilla, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows a significant mismatch between its clinical nomenclature and the actual state and local procurement activity indexed under it. The recent opportunities posted under this code do not involve surgical procedures, orthopedic implants, or any medical devices or supplies directly related to maxillofacial surgery. Instead, the code is tagged on solicitations for comprehensive healthcare administration services—inmate medical and pharmacy management, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary and urgent care platform services, peer support for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical direction. None of these activities involve the excision of bone or percutaneous surgical approaches that the code's name describes.

The issuing bodies are diverse public healthcare and benefits administrators: Muscogee County Prison (Georgia), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), San Mateo County Health Behavioral Health and Recovery Services (California), and Santa Monica Fire Department (California). Geographic activity clusters in Florida and California, with one Georgia opportunity. A single representative opportunity is the Muscogee County Prison RFP for comprehensive inmate medical and pharmacy services, posted April 15, 2026, with proposals due May 15, 2026, requiring five years of experience with jail or prison populations around 600 inmates and NCCHC accreditation. The code shows little relevant recent activity—the opportunities indexed under it reflect administrative healthcare procurement rather than surgical or medical device supply categories, suggesting either a tagging error in the underlying procurement database or a significant misalignment between the code's clinical definition and how state and local purchasing offices are applying it in practice.