UNSPSC 85681524: Supplement left maxilla with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement left maxilla with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0NUS37Z

UNSPSC 85681524 Supplement left maxilla with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach (Commodity) shows little relevant recent activity among state and local procurement bodies. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure involving tissue grafting to the upper jaw using the patient's own tissue via a percutaneous (needle-based) approach — a clinical intervention typically performed in hospital or specialty surgical settings rather than procured as a commodity or service contract by government purchasers. The most-recent-state-local-contract-opportunities block returns five opportunities posted between February and April 2026, none of which involve maxillofacial surgery or tissue transplantation: the records span inmate medical and pharmacy services (Muscogee County Prison), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County), virtual primary and urgent care (Monroe County), peer support services for behavioral health workers (San Mateo County), and fire department medical direction (Santa Monica). The code and the actual solicitation content do not align; state and local purchasing does not appear to use this code to tag healthcare procurement in the jurisdictions represented in the recent data.

No state and local procurement activity directly related to maxillofacial tissue grafting procedures or the goods and services that support them is evident in the source material. Buyers seeking surgical supplies, implants, or procedural support services typically tag those procurements under different UNSPSC families focused on medical devices, surgical supplies, or hospital services rather than under a procedure-specific code. The mismatch between the clinical code definition and the actual procurement records suggests either that this code is not in active use within state and local government contracting, or that opportunities tagged to it do not represent the nominal scope. Pursue only if your firm has direct solicitations from county hospitals or health systems explicitly requesting this code in their RFPs; otherwise, monitor for future activity rather than pursue.