UNSPSC 85673325: Supplement right elbow bursa and ligament with synthetic substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement right elbow bursa and ligament with synthetic substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0MU30JZ

UNSPSC 85673325, Supplement right elbow bursa and ligament with synthetic substitute, open approach, is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a surgical procedure—orthopedic repair of the elbow using synthetic material in an open surgical approach—but recent state and local opportunities tagged to this code are uniformly healthcare administration, benefits management, occupational health surveillance, and medical staffing services rather than surgical implant procurement or operative services.

The recent opportunities in the dataset span independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office, RFP due October 16, 2026); surgery benefit carve-out programs for employee health plans (City of Long Beach, RFP due October 7, 2026); occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers (Washington State Department of Transportation, RFP due October 9, 2026); emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, RFI due September 25, 2026); pharmacy benefit management (Collier County, RFP due April 9, 2026); and temporary health professional staffing pools (County of Santa Clara Health System, RFP due October 7, 2026). These solicitations reflect municipal human resources, pension administration, transit agency occupational health compliance, and county health system operations—none involve procurement of orthopedic surgical implants or operative supplies. The mismatch between the code's clinical descriptor and the actual work being bought suggests either a systematic miscoding in the state and local dataset or that this code does not represent a meaningful procurement category in the state and local market.