UNSPSC 85672745: Reattachment of head and neck bursa and ligament, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to reattachment of head and neck bursa and ligament, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0MM04ZZ

UNSPSC 85672745 Reattachment of head and neck bursa and ligament, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its nominal scope as a clinical surgical procedure. The six opportunities posted between July and September 2026 in the source materials span occupational medical surveillance (Washington State Ferries), independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations (Phoenix Fire and Police Pension Boards), surgical and medical procedure carve-out benefits for municipal employees (Long Beach), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County), temporary health professional staffing pools (Santa Clara County Health System), and specialty medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department). None of these solicitations seek the orthopedic surgical procedure or procedure-specific clinical services the code nominally describes; instead, they address administrative healthcare contracting, workforce staffing, and benefits management at the government-payer level rather than direct provision of surgical reattachment procedures.

State and local governments do not typically procure individual surgical procedures through competitive bidding processes or contract vehicles comparable to RFP, RFQ, or IFB notice structures. Surgical services are generally delivered within integrated health systems, through hospital provider agreements, or under managed-care networks negotiated separately from procedure-line-item procurement. The code assignment to these recent opportunities appears to reflect a data-classification mismatch rather than genuine alignment with the clinical service scope. Firms evaluating pursuit under this code should verify whether it reflects actual state and local buying activity in their target markets or whether the code serves primarily as a federal or clinical-coding taxonomy artifact in state and local procurement systems.