UNSPSC 85663608: Transfer right shoulder tendon, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to transfer right shoulder tendon, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0LX14ZZ

UNSPSC 85663608 Transfer right shoulder tendon, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement. The code nominally describes a surgical procedure code applied to medical reimbursement or clinical operations taxonomy, but the recent opportunities tagged to this code span occupational medical surveillance, independent disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, surgical carve-out benefits administration, temporary health professional staffing, emergency medical services for youth in custody, and other health care administrative and staffing services that do not involve shoulder tendon transfer procedures. The mismatch between the code's clinical-procedure specificity and the administrative and occupational health nature of actual recent solicitations suggests that this code may be a tagging artifact rather than a functional procurement category for state and local buyers.

No state and local contracts actively solicited under UNSPSC 85663608 for shoulder tendon transfer services or related clinical procedures appear in the recent opportunity record. The tagged opportunities instead reflect health system administrative functions (benefits management, occupational health programs, disability evaluations, staffing services) that typically fall under broader health care service codes rather than procedure-specific clinical codes. Business development professionals should verify code alignment with the issuing jurisdictions before pursuing activity nominally tagged to this code; the administrative and staffing nature of actual recent postings suggests the code is either misapplied by purchasing offices or reflects a data-tagging inconsistency rather than genuine procurement demand for the procedure itself.