UNSPSC 85662722: Excision of right upper leg tendon, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to excision of right upper leg tendon, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0LBL4ZZ

UNSPSC 85662722 Excision of right upper leg tendon, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not reflect the work actually being solicited under it in recent state and local procurement. The recent opportunities posted against this code span independent medical evaluation services, occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary clinical staffing placement, and surgical benefit program administration—none of which align with a surgical procedure code naming a specific orthopedic intervention. The mismatch suggests either miscoding by issuing bodies or a taxonomy collision in the procurement database; the code does not capture meaningful current purchasing activity for state and local governments in its stated scope.

State and local activity under this code shows no coherent pattern. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona) solicited independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations; the Washington State Department of Transportation solicited occupational medical surveillance across fourteen ferry system locations; and Collier County (Florida) solicited pharmacy benefit management services covering 2,400 employees and 4,800 members. A Long Beach (California) RFP sought a surgical procedure carve-out program for Centers of Excellence, and Santa Clara County (California) established a qualified vendor pool for temporary ancillary clinical staffing. The geographic spread reaches Arizona, Washington, California, and Florida, but the work is administrative, staffing, and benefit management rather than surgical provision. The code shows little actionable signal for firms pursuing surgical services or procedure-specific contracts at the state and local level.