UNSPSC 85653741: Drainage of right upper arm muscle, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of right upper arm muscle, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0K974ZZ

UNSPSC 85653741 Drainage of right upper arm muscle, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not align with actual state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, yet recent state and local opportunities tagged under it reflect healthcare administration, benefits management, occupational medical surveillance, and staffing services — none involving the named surgical intervention.

The recent opportunities show no connection to the code's clinical scope. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office solicited independent medical evaluation services for disability benefit determinations (RFP RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026); the City of Long Beach requested proposals for surgical procedure carve-out benefits through centers of excellence (RFP HR26753, due October 7, 2026); the Washington State Department of Transportation sought occupational medical surveillance across 14 ferry system locations (RFP RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026); Harris County Juvenile Probation Department issued an RFI for emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth (RFI 071626BNM, due September 25, 2026); Collier County Board of County Commissioners issued an RFP for pharmacy benefit management services (RFP 25-8414); and the County of Santa Clara Health System established a qualified vendor pool for temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories (RFQ RFSQHHSFY270052, due October 7, 2026). None of these opportunities involve percutaneous endoscopic drainage procedures. The code shows little relevant recent activity, and the mismatch between its nominal scope and the work actually being solicited suggests either a cataloging error or a widespread misclassification in the tagging system.